While culverts are simple in concept, consisting of a pipe, an entrance and an outlet, their hydraulics can be quite complicated. Many combinations of flows can occur, depending on the headwater and tailwater levels, whether flows inside the culvert are sub-critical or super-critical, and whether there is a transformation from one state to the other.
In the 1960s, the US Federal Highway Administration (Herr & Bossy, 1965) developed a design procedure that simplified possible flow situations into two cases - inlet and outlet control. This is based on the idea that the flowrate through a culvert, for a given set of headwater and tailwater levels, will be controlled by (a) an orifice effect at the entrance, (b) friction effects within the pipe, or (c) the tailwater level at the outlet.
Outlet level occurs when pipe friction or the downstream tailwater level control the flow, limiting it to some level below the entrance flow capacity. A number of cases can occur, with full and part-full flows in the culvert, as shown below:
Outlet control analysis requires that a hydraulic grade line (HGL) be projected backwards from the outlet of the culvert, allowing for exit, friction and entrance losses, all of which are a function of velocity head V2/2g, where V is the pipe flow velocity. This requires a starting point. If the tailwater submerges the outlet, as in the first case shown above, the starting level is the tailwater level. If the tailwater is below the obvert of the culvert, the starting point is the higher of the tailwater level and a level half way between the obvert and the critical depth of the flow at the outlet, as shown in the third diagram above. For a particular set of culvert dimensions and flowrate, the upwards-projected line can determine the headwater level.
Herr and Bossy developed a trial and error design procedure whereby headwater levels were determined making inlet control and outlet control assumptions. The case that gave the higher headwater level was assumed to govern the situation.
DRAINS and hydraulic programs apply more complex procedures, but the basis is the same. DRAINS applies relationships developed by Henderson and Boyd.